A new way to DIRT?

This week I tried a new way of doing DIRT.

My year 12 group did an assessment and I wanted to overcome two obstacles when giving feedback to an entire group:

a) How do you provide purposeful and individualised feedback to an entire group but in a way that is an efficient use of marking time for the teacher? This question was inspired by a recent INSET day on efficient marking where our Head of English ran a session where the emphasis was clear; marking must be manageable – so how can we do that? It was so practical and I left with renewed determination to get creative with my marking.

b) How can we foster a sense of ownership over their own improvement among our A-level students? I completed a Masters in Education that explored ways to facilitate independent learning among A-level geographers two years ago, but I’m still exploring new ways to achieve this!

I think this new method addresses both of these obstacles.

How does it work?

1. I marked their essays and they received only a mark out of 10.

2. I collated all of the opportunities for improvement on to this DIRT feedback ranking activity sheet, which looks like this:

DIRT feedback ranking activity 2

3. The concept is very similar to using marking codes, except I didn’t put any codes on to the students’ work. Instead, when they received their essay back, they also got this sheet with it. They then had to decide, by ticking or crossing, if they felt they had met each criteria within their essay.

4. Since many of them could have ticked quite a few of the boxes, they were then asked to rank which of these improvement activities they felt was the biggest priority for improving their writing.

5. They then used their DIRT time to specifically target their self-chosen biggest priorities.


Why did this work?

  1. This really encouraged students to be reflective about what had gone well and what they needed to improve, which really encouraged deeper engagement with the ways to improve, rather than simply the mark that they got.
  2. It saved me lots of time writing individualised comments, which the students were mostly able to work out for themselves!
  3. When I came back to revisit their improvements, I could see what they had ranked as ‘1’ or ‘2’ as their improvement priority, and then I could assess their writing for evidence of that skill. It meant that the renewed marking wasn’t simply marking their work again, but focused upon exactly what it was they needed to improve. If you look at this example below, the student stated that they wanted their biggest focus to be on ‘questioning the question’ and focusing on the command word ‘assess’. As you can see within their writing, not only has their assessment improved, but my marking needed only to monitor that specific element of their improvement.DIRT 2 ADIRT 2
  4. The balance between me having found specific areas for them to focus on but them having the autonomy to choose which of those most applied for them meant that students felt supported but not spoon-fed, which is, in my books, a really positive outcome for very time-efficient teacher input.

If you do try this method, I’d love to hear about it! Please tweet me @EduCaiti


Author: EduCaiti

Hi. I'm Caiti. I am a second in department and geography teacher in my sixth year of teaching.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s